Extended Hiatus

No, I'm not burned out or disillusioned or anything of the sort. For the next few months at least however, I won't be having or making the time to update this blog.

God Bless To All.

Happy New Year!

TWO: Great Post (December 2008ze)

In work around the home, women do the work they want (always easy stuff in the house) which they call 'feminine' while men get stuck doing the work the women don't want to do (always outside work usually fixing cars, lawn care, and working on the house) which they call 'masculine'.

The same is occurring in the work force. The jobs women want to work in (journalism, TV, media, Human resources, writing, entertainment, easy jobs) are all taken by them while the rest are left over to men (math jobs, engineering, blue-collar labor). God has dispersed gifts differently among men; not every guy is a math whiz or is a natural engineer. I'm not. My skills are in different areas which, unfortunately, are saturated with women.

Throughout college, I worked with women in most of my jobs (which I quickly learned much about their ways). In my college, the ratio of males to females was 40% to 60%.

From dates I would go on, I found that women were never interested in me. After I worked out, they were quite intersted in my body but still not interested in me. I always thought something was wrong with me. But I soon figured out that they were interested in me only as a meal ticket (they wanted to retire as a stay at home mom). They didn't care about my dreams. My life was always, in some way, to serve *them*.

All of my old male friends match that description of 'unmotivated' types. But all of them, each in their own different ways, came to the realization of what AW are and refuse to marry. I was very ambitious too (and somehow made it through college) when I believed there were some good AW out there. When I stopped believing in it, when I made the decision never to have a family or get married, such "ambition" dropped from me. I stopped giving a damn. If there is one good thing about the concept of love, it at least puts you to work through shit you normally wouldn't go through.

With the death of love comes young men refusing to work shitty jobs. And they are shitty jobs because women have taken everything else. Even being a math whiz or engineer is not enough as your job can be outsourced. As a fan of capitalism, I have no problem with this. I just wish I could outsource for my wife as well. This protectionism the government is creating with marriage is infuriating at best.

Sax's talk about endocrine disruptors is such ridiculous nonsense. I don't drink bottled water and my water, for all my life, has come out of a private well. He might as well blame an astrological phenomenon ("Neptune is in alignment with Jupiter") for this.

The lack of motivation in young men (I percieve it more as a waking up) is really the death of love in the West. Without love of country, no man would throw himself into enemy bullets. Without love of women, no man will throw himself into high stress shit-sandwhich jobs.

To the older generation, know that it isn't roses down here with the younger generation. But while despair is widespread, it is a very different factor. Consider Hamlet's drop into despair, indecision, and agony. It did not come with the ghost, it was there when the play started. There are two great psychological ballasts in a man's life: his mother and his wife. Hamlet's mother, three months after his father dies, marries his uncle very easily and without a second thought. When Ophelia, being filled with lies from her father, rejects Hamlet, the second ballast is broken and he begins to fall into the abyss.

I am fortunate in that my mother is a true woman and is almost married to my father for well over forty years. But disapointment after disapointment with AW created a pattern where it became clear women do not believe in love, at least not in the way a man does, and will openly exploit that love (just as businesses will exploit the 'hard working man' if they can. Work him to death, fire him, get a new guy off the line. Repeat).

Napoleon Hill put the transmutation of love as a chapter in his secrets of success. Some guys here such as Spartacus has said that love was very important part of his success.

Those who celebrate the Marriage Strike because of a schadenfreude of wanting to see women in pain need to know that the death of love is the cause and both young women and young men will suffer equally.

We are all fucked.

From DGM

Nature (December 21 to 31)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008zd)

Publikwerks: I especially like Emily's tale of woe.

“Mark,” she adds, “was the best sex I ever had.” But that was long ago. “We fight instead,” she says. “We’re embroiled in some weird combat. It’s like Lysistrata. I tell him, ‘Your business is going to have to get better faster.’ Until then, I’m withholding.”

When Emily comes home, she doesn’t always want to be the boss. But she says her husband no longer has the authority to take over. “I want somebody to take that power role away from me,” she explains.

I feel bad for Mark. Emily is gonna cheat on him within the year. If you are at the point of using sex as a bargaining point, it's time for a divorce.

She's already riding another horse. And probably wants someone else to control too. She's cunning enough to cover her tracks and keep him in the dark. Poor guy. He's getting taken to the cleaners and he isn't even aware. But us Farkers are, lady. So are the readers of the article. When sex becomes a weapon, it's over.

White. Collar. Trash.

Unknown

Nature (December 21 to 31)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008zc)

I have never heard anyone say this, but you could actually turn all of this around on women- say, "Well, Andrea Yates got off easy for drowning all five of her children because women are by legal definition already considered to be mentally ill and stupid and are nothing but property and are held to a far, far lower standard than men and that is why men are punished more harshly... and besides, women never learn from their mistakes anyway because all their decisions are based on their stupid 'emotions'- and that's probably really the reason why- or used to be, and society just stays on that course. Of course the enraging part of it is that women are suppossed to now be considered 'equal' but of course men and women are not even alike, much less 'equal.' All I'm saying is that you could really turn this one around on women and do a number on their heads next time you get into a discussion with women on this topic.

You're not going to be able to turn this around on women. If you really think that, it's obvious you've never actually spoken to a western woman. Since they're not restricted by logic or integrity, they can lie or make random nonsensical arguments, which they'll simply repeat until you give up, or they'll just resort to shaming/ad hominem attacks until you give up. I don't think women even realize that they lie and contradict themselves so much, they honestly always believe they're right and that the facts just get in the way. This is what is meant by them being emotional I suppose.

Women consider themselves "equal" and "independant" when it suits them to fight against "oppression" and to be allowed to do something they want to. When it doesn't suit them, that is, when there is responsibility or punishment, they immediately claim they are weaker and they're women, so they shouldn't have to be held to a standard.

I still think women are genetically like this. It's simply happening in too many cultures around the world for it to be just a planned western problem. Women are little children, and just like little children they will run amok if you don't control them. For whatever reason, we, and the rest of the world, feels it shouldn't control women anymore. As a child i'd read biblical stories, and I noticed that throughout history, according to the bible, there were civilizations that became "godless" and were then destroyed. I don't remember the specifics anymore, but I guess, if you truly believe in religion, maybe this is what kept happening in the past. Women were repeatedly given too much power, and then society would always crumble. Maybe we need another flood or something.

Phoenix

Nature (Decmeber 21 to 31)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008zb)

You know once she encounters a man who actually doesn't desire her sexually, AND he is straight and desirable, her insecurity and her vindictiveness requires that she try as best as she can to crush that man with all her "might."

It is the greatest slight against a woman for a man NOT to find her sexually desirable, cause it is the entire reason for each woman's being. Sexuality is really all there is to woman. And in American women especially, the low self esteem, combined with their feminist need to dominate everything male means that the murder of any man who crosses her sexually (not rape, but oh, umm, watching Porn, or not hitting on her, or whatever) is perfectly justifiable.

How do I know this? Articles are posted on this on a weekly basis, and I have met enough women who were more than happy to assassinate my character and reputation cause I hit on another girl rather than them, and plenty of women who decided I was a vile creature for consuming porn while not having a GF.

Women emotionally mature? Get out!

Unknown

Nature (December 21 to 31)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008za)

They want the 50's and yet they are still feminists. Hmmmmm. Something not adding up. Oh wait, there it is: "No desire to hold a job", "lay around and watch Game Show Network", "spend time doing my hobbies". Ahh yes, the idealized version of the past. Not the version where most working class normal folks had to bust their butts to make ends meet. The common thread is always, "I want to be taken care of", "Husband does the work."

Women need to wake up from their dream and realize that they can't all be the princess. Only the King's daughter gets to be the princess. That is to say, there are not that many of them. In fact, they are fantastically rare. These worthless women are going to continue to be disappointed until they learn that a lifetime a hard work is everyone's destiny, in the home or out. Joy has to be found in service, to family and community, not finding a sucker to run into the ground.

I would love to find a women that is even kinda like my sister. But where do you find a Christian woman who submits to her husband, cooks 3 meals a day, bakes breads, cans jams and jellies, takes care of and homeschools the kids, sews, keeps the whole house clean, and prays.

They are out there but they are rare. Sure, lots of women want to stay at home, but they are not looking for the "work at taking care of the home" thing.

So realistically, where are the truly old-fashioned, willing to take care of the home and kids types? My theory is that they are so rare that only a few perceptive and high end professionals, like doctors are finding them. The average woman, for the average man is a nightmare. Yeah, my sister is married to a doctor. She could be buying diamonds and going to parties with his money but she would rather spend time at home in there country styled house, cooking, cleaning and taking care of kids.

Viking

Nature (December 21 to 31)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008z)

I am an avid player of chess. People that play chess understand life, whereas those that don't greatly lose out on a game which can give them insight into life as well as strategic thinking. Consider in life that men fall into the categories of pawn, knight, bishop, rook, and king - synonymous with the pieces on a chessboard - and all bow to the queen who is the most powerful piece on the chessboard - synonymous with men bowing and being slaves to women in the Anglosphere. Rarely do we see a man in the Anglosphere viewing himself more than a chesspiece. He mindlessly takes his role, whether it be pawn, knight, bishop, rook, or king and bows to the queens of his life. However, the chessmaster bows to no one, and moves and controls each chesspiece for his advantage. You need to rise above your chesspiece status in life, and become the chessmaster, by transforming yourself to be above it all. If you don't, you will be constantly bowing to the queens in your life, and be used by other chessmasters to their advantage, and to your detriment.

Let us expand on this analogy of this Human Chessboard.

The Queen is the woman to which all the other pieces bow. The Pawn is the usual shmuck, the laborer, the dumb wage-slave who easily gets pushed around. The Bishop is the religious entity such as a priest or pastor. The Rook is the political entity such as a legislator or judge. The Knight is the 'shining hero', the guy who attempts to be the hero at everything. These knights are often found in dangerous professions such as the military, police, and firefighting.

What about the King? Why does the game end when he gets captured? And what about the chessboard itself? Does it represent something? How does the Queen move so freely throughout the board while other pieces are more restricted? Why do Pawns turn into Queens when they get 'promoted' at the end of the board (or sometimes they turn into Knights)? And who is the Chessmaster's opponent? After all, he must be playing against someone.

The King represents status itself. "The King is a 'Thing'," Shakespeare's Hamlet mused. Most people see success only through the eyes, never through the mind. Most people worm their way through the world just to boost the 'status' to appear greater in other peoples' eyes. The King is free to move in any direction because he has all the status. Yet, he moves very little because otherwise it would be risky to his 'status'. We know how quickly those with high status can fall. The game ends when the 'King' gets captured because that is the goal of all the players on the board: all the Queens, Bishops, Rooks, Knights, and Pawns want the status of the King.

The Chessboard is Nature. The Queen is so powerful because Nature works so well in their favor (in speeding through and maneuvering around men... the other chess pieces). Each piece's greater understanding of Nature allows greater movement. Pawns are the most ignorant of Nature so they only slowly march forward. Since Pawns are always stuck in the present, they can never move backwards. The Bishop and Rook (politician) study the Queen (our glorious Anglo Female!) to manipulate the other males. So the Bishop and Rook can mimic some of the Queen's powers. The Knight is unpredictable and can zig zag on Nature's board
Every Pawn's dream is reach the end of the board to become a Queen themselves. These are the 'laborers' who suddenly become glitzy movie actors or some other star. They are literally 'queens' at that point. Every now and then, a few will opt to become the Knight.

The Chessmaster is not outside of Nature. He is not the Machiavelli of the world (that would be the Queen). The Chessmaster PLAYS all the pieces on Nature. The reason why most people end up being a piece on the board is that their perception does not seek to view the entire board. The Queen will always see herself as a Queen. The rest of the pieces will always bow towards her resulting in what they become.

The opponent of the Chessmaster is Time itself. The Chessmaster and Time play a grueling game on the board of Nature. Woman, the 'Queen' that all people throw themselves toward, is the most manipulative and dirtiest piece on the board of Nature. The other pieces are so overwhelmed and confused by Nature so they, no doubt, see the Queen as a divine and celestial goddess. Time is working Nature against the Chessmaster. But the Chessmaster can work Nature against Time as well. Who were those who checkmated Time? Every great legend, financial, engineering, or artistic, lives through people's minds because they bested Time. Shakespeare revealed all he did was hold a mirror up to Nature and Time didn't have a chance. All the Carnegies and Napoleons of the world became so by understanding (Human) Nature. The pieces are forever locked onto the plane of Nature and the Queen naturally becomes their greatest fear... and greatest desire to become. The Chessmaster laughs at those who desire to become Queens for they will forever be pinned down to Nature... never ascending to combat Time.

Mirror Of The Soul

Nature (December 21 to 31)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008y)

Here are three chats, different women, I had in the near past:

"Yea, he is a bit older than me, but such a good man, we dated a few months"
"But he is not your boyfriend?"
"No, we just date"
"And you dont shag, I presume"
"Oh, no, I am making him wait. He is a good man. Am thinking of a relationship"
"So, do not tell me you have not had sex in these months"
"Are you crazy? Of course I have!!!"
------------------
"I dont like slow dances.."
"Why is that now?"
"Strange guys dancing close to me.. I dont like it"
"Well, that is the point of slow dances..."
"Yea, but guys I dont know, so close, and trying to get closer"
"So, you do not dance with strange guys"
"No. I told you."
"Do not tell me you don't take strange guys home"
"Of course I do. That is different."
-------------------------
"You taking him home tonite?"
"Yea, I need a man"
"Even if he is that drunk?"
"Yea, I need a man."
"But you will not ask this guy's number, right?"
"You insane?? Why would I want his number???"
-------------------------

It is a different thing for them.

And, in the meantime, a guy doing the same behavior, is a bastard, an asshole, a male chauvinist objectifying the woman, and he just wants sex.

That must be a sin, just wanting sex out of these innocent fragile creatures...

Oh, about the topic,

Chivalry is dead.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Edit: Not in the blog comment, but just remembered, one of these girls banged some successfull dude, not a nice guy tho, a real asshole (in this case, I can say, he was quality, the asshole comes from not supplicating to women. When I met him, I liked him), a lawyer too, for two weeks.

In the end, after two weeks of banging, he dumped her, and she was shaken. And he was labeled asshole... Bastard... Devil.. Evil.. etc... A full frontal attack on his existence...

Just because he did not have the same future plans with her, as those she had with him.

Funny thing is, this girl has done the same to countless men, justifying it as, he is boring, he is stupid, he is dumb, etc etc... (Nevermind that she had fucked these guys anyway)....

Z.G. (I think)

My Three Favorite Xmas Songs...

AC DC - Mistress For Christmas


Mariah Carey - Oh Holy Night


Chris de Burgh - A Spaceman Came Travelling

TWO: Great Post (December 2008x)

All Men Are Rapists!!!
by Duncan Idaho
January 31, 2007

Yes, according to feminists and the government, the definition of rape is very broad indeed, as that serves the purpose of throwing more men in prison primarily on the say-so of women.

What they fail to note, of course, is that if a rape complaint does not end in prosecution then in all likelihood there was no rapist! So there's no rapist to "get away with it."

Obviously if a woman is genuinely raped but the rapist is not located, then a rapist has got away with it, but that's not the case if a guy is accused of rape but it is found the woman consented. It's not like burglary. If someone's house is broken into and their DVD player nicked, and no suspect is found, then a burglar has gotten away with it. But if a woman consents to sex, changes her mind the next morning and shrieks "Raaaaaype!" but the jury sees through her bullshit and deigns to find the alleged rapist innocent, then no rape took place and so no rapist has "gotten away with it."

Of course, I'm being silly here and applying logic to the scenario. Logic has no place with man-hating feminist scum and the vote-hungry vermin politicians who bow down to their whim.

Duncan Idaho

Nature (December 21 to 31)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008w)

DuncanMhor - I earn less than my wife, for a while there, substantially less. She supported me to go back to university for a year. Three years later, there's only a small imbalance in our earnings.

Money has not been an issue. We split all the bills 50/50, it just means I have less spending money than she does after the bills are settled.


Then money IS an issue.

You just try that if you're ever making more than she is.

"Sorry honey... My money's my money, your money's your money... I'll let you know how the movie was!"

With women, it generally seems "our money" only exists when it's "your money."

It's the same with pre-nups. Hardly ever hear of a broke-ass chick who doesn't complain about how horribly unromantic pre-nups are and how it's just "planning for the marriage to fail," but give her more than two nickels to rub together and she's the first one on the phone to a lawyer.

Time to to boot 'em out of the workplace, the increased demand will increase men's salaries and put the money back in their hands... where they can better handle that power without turning into some mean-spirited selfish, shrieking harpy.

It's not like they bring all that much into the business world anyway... The ones that aren't histrionic nut-jobs rarely make up for the damage caused by the ones who are.

Bad guys on the job are typically incompetent but innocuous... Bad women in the workplace are typically vicious.

...and apparently in marriage too.

And yes, I AM feeling quite misogynistic at the moment... as my disgust for these horrible coonts wears off (who don't even have the basic decency to be ashamed of their horrendous attitudes and behavior), perhaps that feeling will fade as well... but only time will tell.

Unknown

Nature (December 21 to 31)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008v)

I came up with this just this morning. Feel free to add some more to the list.

1. "You get what you give."

(Unless you're a woman, of course, because women give nothing and expect everything to be handed to them and done for them by a network of men and big daddy government.



2. "Respect is something you have to earn."

(Unless you're a woman, then respect is something you simply DEMAND and never bother to earn.)



3. "Accountability and responsibility are the cornerstones of character."

(Unless you're a woman, because women are not accountable for their actions- they simply blame someone else for their actions, mistakes and/or bad decisions and /or crimes and are excused and barely ever punished.)



4. "Hard work leads to success."

(Unless you're a woman, because women use deception, manipulation and fraud to get what they want, so they don't feel they need to make any effort at all in life or make any worthwhile contribution. Women laugh at people behind their backs who work hard.)



5. "Commit the crime, do the time."

(Unless you're a woman- refer to no. 3)



6. "Adultery will destroy your marriage."

(Unless you're a woman, then you can just blame your adultery on your husband for not "meeting your needs" or some other lame, stupid excuse)



7. "Marriage requires commitment."

(Unless you're a woman, because a woman is fickle and bases her decisions on her 'feelings,' so then she just files a 'no fault' divorce whenever the wind is blowing through her head the wrong direction one day and ejects her husband out of his own house on some arbitrary whim.)



8. "Right is right and wrong is wrong."

(Unless you're a woman, of course.)



9. "Real friends come through loyalty and consistency."

(Unless you're a woman, because women feel loyalty is a sign of weakness and women are infamously inconsistent, therefore women never really have any 'real' friends.



10. "What goes around comes around."

(Sorry ladies, this one applies to you as well, and women 'get it' 'coming around' harder than anyone else in the end. Can you say, "Anna Nicole Smith?" Isn't payback a BITCH, bitch?")

Ditchthebitch

Nature (December 21 to 31)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008u)

The Way
by Pook
July 13, 2006

"But Monsieur Pook, speak truly. What is this thing you call... The Way?"

The Way is the default life most men revolve around. The Way is routinely celebrated and held up as the only Way.

The Way consists of the following:

-Go to school. Get good grades. Do the senior prom, go to school dances, give a girl your high school class ring, and garbage like that.

-Go to college. Get even more good grades. Participate with the campus activities, especially the feminist ones. Celebrate the Vagina Monologues. Become a mangina and write against evil patriarchy and how women need more rights and security.

-Get a job, not in something you like, but in something that provides security. Make money by working harder.

-Meet a girl, fall in love, and marry her. Participate in the elaborate wedding and the honeymoon to a place you didn't choose.

-Buy a big house because of the expectation of kids.

-Once married, the other married guys show you how the system works by showing you the home improvement activities you now get to engage on. Yes, you get to go buy hammers and screws to continually improve the house. Lawn care, house care, car care, yes, your purpose is to maintain this physical shelter and make it look 'acceptable'.

-Have a kid or two. Wife gets fat and cuts her hair. You must accept this. You will now work harder and be forced to get promoted due to the rising costs. You have become the wage slave.

-Keep doing this for decades until your soul evaporates. As your body breaks down (it will at this fast pace), let your wife play the role as the 'nurse' as you begin to make continual trips to the hospital.

-Die.

Sound fun? It certainly doesn't sound appealing to me. Keep in mind that I am not knocking college, good grades, children, home improvement, and all that. What I am knocking is the pre-formulated life. This 'default' view is life in the Matriarchy. And this is if you are lucky and were not divorced.

Pook

Nature (December 1 to 20)

Expanding The List

Can't believe that I forgot... ...at the top of the page

"self-righteous" & "sanctimonious" (December 20, 2008)
"ball-busting" "egotistical" "nagging" ) December 21, 2008)
"judgemental" (December 28, 2008)

Pretty sad that the 500 characters that Google allows bloggers in the heading at the top of the page is totally inadequate to adequately describe your garden variety WW. I'm tired of wasting time trying to figure out which adjectives to delete in order to make room for better ones so, I've decided to put them all in a post which of course will have no limit on how long it can be.

Uzem & Luzem
Pumpem & Dumpem
Fuckem & Chuckem

Because cunts are...

Arrogant Back-Stabbing Ball-Busting Bitchy Catty Cold Calculating Conniving Controlling Delusional Deceitful Demanding Devious Dishonest Egotistical Evil Emotional Fake Flaky Fraudulent Gossiping Greedy Hateful Hypocritical Illogical Immature Inconsiderate Irrational Irresponsible Judgemental Manipulative Materialistic Mean-Spirited Nagging Narcissistic Nasty Passive-Aggressive Petty Power-Tripping Remorseless Sanctimonious Selfish Self-Righteous Shallow Spiteful Slave-Driving Spoiled Stubborn Thoughtless Unapologetic Unappreciative Undependable Unfaithful Unfeminine Ungrateful Ungracious Unreasonable Unsatisfiable Unstable Unsympathetic Untrustworthy Vain Vengeful Vicious Vindictive Violent & Whining Creatures.

The above is usually what one has to look forward to once the typical WW drops the sweet girl act after a couple of months. Who the hell needs that kind of creature in their life on a constant basis?

TWO: Great Post (December 2008t)

Women are in denial about the evil, violent nature of women. They kill babies by the tens of millions and then they make ridiculous statements and try to shame men. Women are in denial about how violent they are towards human beings.

When are they going to wake up and take responsibility that society's breakdown is their fault? Men have empathy towards life and women have no feelings towards anything but themselves. All of their actions are based on feelings not rational thought. That's why most women have the maturity level of little girls most of their life.

Women are the problem. They do nothing but use their looks and sex to manipulate men to get whatever they want. They know nothing about dignity, maturity, class, selflessness or compassion towards life.

Women are disgusting whores their whole lives and go after the bad boys who treat them like shit. Then when they get dumped enough times they decide to find some stupid beta male who they don't respect to finance their lives and be their slave for the rest of their life.

Wake up you disgusting hags. Men have figured you out. You weren't oppressed for centuries. You were taken care of by men. Men built the homes you lived in. Men created the material things in your life. It's men that have been oppressed. Millions of men have died in wars while women stayed home and cleaned the house and cooked. How about paying homage to all the men who died on the battlefield for you. Instead you group together in the millions now to bad mouth men who are taught to jump in front of a bullet for you. You sick disgusting pigs.

I really wish the grim reaper will meet you at the gates of hell (because that's where most of you are going) and when you realize that you are going to spend the rest of eternity in hell, think of me laughing my ass off.

Anonymous December 16 2007 19:13

Happy Holidays!

Nature (December 1 to 20)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008s)

Every single job I have worked in with mainly women has been a living hell for me. If you are not EXACTLY like them, meaning raddled with insecurities, vicious, hateful, backstabbing, controlling, and spiteful, then they will go out of their way to do everything they can to destroy you. God help you if you are younger, more attractive than them, and have a successful, HAPPY marriage. If that's the case, you might as well be walking around with a target on your back. God, the memories of the passive-aggressive bullshit these types pull makes me shudder. I think I actually have PTSD from it, it was that freaking horrible. I am about to give up and go be a plumber, because I swear, working with sexist men is a freaking cake walk compared to working with my "sisters". Screw those bitches.
Amanda


My wife is a year out of college and currently working in a 90%+ female environment and she says the same as you. Recently she asked me what I would do if I were confronted by a co-worker or supervisor who started yelling at me for a petty reason. Apparently this is a problem where she works... it's been very rare in the mostly male places I've worked. I told her that the way that it was dealt with when someone wanted to show their ass at work was to calmly look the other guy in the eye and explain that we could talk when he was ready to talk to me like an adult. She told me that wouldn't work on women (or at least these women.) I'd never thought about it, but I understood immediately.
Unknown

Nature (December 1 to 20)

Women

TWO: Great Post (December 2008r)

I tend to think women are women, usually, but what we have is an inversion of what desirable men are all about. If good men were deemed as valuable mates, women (largely) en mass would be entering into long term relations, marrying, being loyal, raising children to be productive, wise, and self-reliant. What we have is a different story. Women are going after promiscuous men, thugs, the emotionally bankrupt, metrosexuals . . . and are procreating with them to fashion spoiled brats that will be weak-willed and histrionic adults. This will have a deleterious effect in the future; we are already seeing it happening.

In Western culture, and over here in America where I reside, women still regard good, decent men as bores, men for utility purposes, and these men take the brunt of the blame for societal woes and women's bullshit despite keeping the gears of society moving. Make no mistake about it; women expect the nice guys to sacrifice themselves for crumbs of attention and will exploit them if not tempted with a bigger, better deal in the mean time.

Women are terrible in this regard; but not bonding with good men in their twenties they are seriously screwing this system up, for men, and ultimately themselves. I give America two generations to get its act together, and for women to wake up (if ever) before we are a faded superpower in [the] annuls of history, and with that women helped make this country into a shallow, economically over-bloated mess.

I personally can't imagine trying to save a screaming, demanding harpy in her 40s and 50s from her mounting debt and self-destructive appetites. They have little to offer; their looks have faded, their expectations are still high, they are ungrateful if any "Average Joe" shows them a modicum of attention. And who the fuck wants to raise the brats from a sociopath these women got banged by when they were younger? Crazy manginas, perhaps.

With the exception of one woman I dated, ALL of the women I had relations with in the past were notoriously BAD with money and either had nothing to show for it at the end of the month, bad credit, debt, or all of the above. Without any employment and a "supplemental" income they would have been out on the streets and starving. I'm not a millionaire, but if the place where I'm employed burnt down I could survive without unemployment for some time while finding other work. They couldn't. And what is fascinating is that this phenomenon is spreading---women are still looking for Prince Charming and he's simply not showing up.

Sociopathic Revolution 5:30 am

Programming Note

Larry King will be interviewing Alec Baldwin tonight at 9pm eastern on CNN. If his interview with Diane Sawyer was any indication, Baldwin won't be pulling any punches when it comes to marriage, divorce, the divorce industry and parental alienation.

One of the reasons that I love the rant below is because I think it's a perfect example of why children need their fathers. Too many broads are more interested in being a friend to their children rather than a parent. I don't need to be a parent to know that the carrot doesn't always work with kids, sometimes you need to whip out the proverbial stick and put the fear of God in them. Most 'mothers' are simply unequipped or unwilling to do that. Sure, Baldwin may have gone a wee bit over board but I can only imagine the rage I would feel if something like that ever happened to me.

Sad though, that as with all divorced, non custodial dads, the system basically undermines Baldwin's authority as a dad and renders him powerless. How can he impose or enforce any discipline on the little twerp when he only gets to see her once or twice a week?

Not wanting to hear my dad get pissed off at me was a pretty good motivator to do the right thing but I would have been much less intimidated if I was hearing him go off on the phone knowing that
1. He's 3000 miles away and
2. If he laid a finger on me during visitation, I would just have to say the word and the courts would take care of him.

Truth be told, under such circumstances, instead of being intimidated, I'd probably have found his ranting amusing as I suspect Baldwin's daughter did.





Related Posts
Alec Baldwin on Divorce, Children and Reconciliation

Nature (December 1 to 20)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008q)

I have never been married, but I have had similar experiences with my long term relationships. Like the sudden divorce syndrome, I have had a girlfriend of 4 years wake up one morning and decide it was over - no real reason beyond her feelings.

Like the men in this article - I had no clue until she dropped the bomb. I had provided everything she wanted, done everything she asked and yet her "feelings" were lost. Overnight.

This was obviously written for women to justify their actions, but it is more so a warning to men - never give your heart to a modern woman. These women demonstrate how modern women have absolutely no conscience and lack the ability to empathize with men.

Even if they did mean it when they said they "love" you at that particular moment, their emotions are so volatile that in the next moment, they can arbitrarily dismiss you. Their morals and values will change depending on their emotional state, and with whatever they think they can get away with at the time - using deceit, sandbagging and emotional terrorism.

Unknown


I debated whether or not to post the above because although I think the last 2 paragraphs are gold I've always had a problem with adults (regardless of gender) who claim to have had no clue that they were about to be dumped or their partner was cheating. By definition, the average Joe or Joanne is not an Oscar caliber actor so signs that there's trouble in paradise are usually always there for anyone with eyes to see. Admittedly, the signs are often quite subtle but if we really know and are in tune with the other person subtlety is no excuse. The problem is not that there are no signs, it's that, for whatever reasons, we usually just choose to ignore them - "There are no victims, only volunteers" - been there, done that.

Yes, women are volatile creatures but IMO, their selfishness and their instincts for self preservation trumps their emotional nature (check CEX: Their Core Characteristics on the right) so they rarely make rash decisions that will seriously hurt them in either the short or medium term. By the time they kick a man to the curb most women have long since worked out their exit "strategy" (read: other man / men): "Women are like monkeys - they never let go of one branch until they have their hands on another."

Any man who thinks that his woman just woke up one day and decided to destroy their family or relationship is doubly blind. One, for failing to see that the relationship was going down like the Titanic and two, for never having picked up on the unbelievably cold and calculating nature of women.

U&L

Nature (December 1 to 20)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008p)

Who came up with these laws and what were their purpose?

The people who run things. Follow the $$$. All roads lead to a bank vault. They KNOW the effect that is occurring surely as deteriorating public schools are NO accident either. It is all by design.

Purpose? In short the people running the show have a god complex. The more the non-elites (i.e., citizens, serfs, slaves) are turned and degraded into ignorant animals the more they are gods by comparison.

About women seeing the light or coming to their senses, don't hold your breath. Women, by and large, are incapable of abstract thinking (i.e., thinking beyond the ramifications of something that does not immediately benefit them). They are getting their materialistic and narcissistic needs met. What happens to "society" at large is an abstraction that will be a problem for someone else (if they give it any thought at all). That's why it was very important for the elites to "empower" women. Men can see the long-term damage that would be done by certain courses or social policy. It was necessary to put people, who effectively have the mental capacity of children, into the drivers seat. Much easier to manipulate and control outcomes. It's much easier to psychologically control "children" (e.g., candy, rewards, endless immediate gratification) than it is to control adult males capable of high-order reasoning and abstract thinking.

Anonymous 10:21 pm



VERY VERY true! *applauds* By putting the idiots (overemotional, illogical people...by definition: WOMEN!) in charge of society, we are now all VERY easily controlled!

Anonymous 10:25 pm

Nature (December 1 to 20)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008o)

I've always believed that men actually suffer more from abortions. Men are more visual, and they can better visualize playing with their young son in the garden, or having their baby daughter ride piggyback with them.

Women are so brainwashed that everything is their right, even killing an innocent unborn child...

What if the father wants the baby.. She gives birth, he pays for the birth, she signs away her rights, and the father raises the kid... Is that too much to ask for your own kid?

No, men suffer more from abortions, as men have a better sense of universal justice, and also a better sense of life.

Men know how valuable life is, as they are the ones who sign up to die.

I am generalizing, exceptions do not break the rule.

Unknown

Nature (December 1 to 20)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008n)

Even if the hardcore feminists were to disappear tomorrow.........

I would not expect any deep-rooted change.

I am unable to adequately explain why I feel this way.

It is a subjective belief.

I can mention that many females possess certain basic traits that are incompatible with how I want to live my life.

There are differences between the genders (other than the obvious physical ones) that are either biological in nature (brain differences) and externally-caused differences (acculturation etc.).

Over my decades of existence I have met many females. A few were decent in regards to how I judge wimmenfolk'. Most were typical females, a species I avoid.

Even without feminism affecting them, I still see too many wimmen' with that "little princess" attitude. I see a self-centeredness combined with "cattiness" and other undesirable traits, too many to mention here.

I do not expect some longed-for "tidal wave" of "normalcy" to envelope the nation.

How can a few males shunning females and/or writing about them compete with the billions of dollars spent by corporations to convince females they need to buy buy buy. The mass media keeps pandering to females in so many ways that warps the female mind, in my opinion.

Even if feminism died I wonder how many females, especially those of limited means, will cease viewing the wedding day as the most important day of their life..... and I mean the ritualistic aspect of it regarding a dress and flowers and cake and all those expensive things while the actual marriage act, the vows, appear to be a distant last in importance?

Nope, for those and a thousand other reasons I do not predict females in general to cast off their emotion-laden illogic, their inability to push aside feeeeeeelings and replace them with rational thinking.

Not that I want females to be logic-driven as Vulcans are in the Star Trek show!!!!!! But, I have simply seen too damn many females make guys miserable with the usual stuff.... gripe gripe gripe without showing gratitude for the good a male has done them. Bringing up the times they thought they were wronged, even if it was an event from two long decades ago.

Too many females, I believe, possess a sense of entitlement merely for being a female.

Oh so many reasons foe me to shun females and so few females I have met that I considered worthy of a good man's attention.

I am not saying that other males should do as i have done....shun females. I have only kept them far away the past 15 years or so. When younger, I had my affairs, did the live together thing. I was careful even back then and, perhaps a bit lucky that the birth control worked properly!!!!!

My freedom was always a little more important than... ughhh I hate the word.... relationships. Enough so I kept moving on.

With age, it was easier to avoid females totally. Life for me is just so much simpler and care-free without having to cater the females whims... something I see the guys doing constantly who are involved with females.

Anyway....... I do hope the "tide turns" in regards to female attitudes and behaviors of the type complained about here. I will not hold my proverbial breath, however, since the basic deep-rooted aspects of females that make so many guys miserable are not necessarily tied into feminist beliefs.

Unknown

Nature (December 1 to 20)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008m)

Illegal Immigration: Serfs for Feminists
by Pook
July 2006

In politics, issues come and go. However, there comes a time when an issue does not sit squarely on a single political side, yet, the issue is huge. The issue is so big that, unless addressed, it gives rise to a third party candidate to disrupt the status quo. In American politics, we have several each century.

Illegal immigration is that issue today. Whichever party seizes control of the issue will be awarded at the detriment of the other.

There is reason to believe that Illegal Immigration is actually a feminist issue. Aside from the legality issue, these aliens from Mexico (and other parts south) are paid very low wages and given jobs that most native Americans won't find attractive (the rhetoric strangely matches what the Confederacy South said about slaves being the 'backbone' of the economy and how everything would crumble without them). The Media does say this. But this is what the Media does not say:

The native Americans who will not do these jobs these aliens do are women. American men are easily found building houses, working farms, doing lawns, and so on. I know this because I have been doing these jobs my entire life. I have worked in the slaughterhouse, in the fields, and, yes, even lawns. This is one of the reasons why I went to college was for the aim to NOT do those things anymore. Many men I know do all these things. Without a doubt, I am sure the agriculture industry as well as others are using illegal immigrants for their purposes. But it cannot be said that American men will not do such harsh blue collar work.

What about the American women? Have you ever seen American women clean up hotels, do someone else's laundry, or be a janitor? If I ever do, it is very poor women, and they are often black. It is surprising that American women would clean their own households let alone someone else's.

The reason why illegal immigration is so prevalent today in America is because of Feminism. Feminists NEED these aliens. I am not the only one to say this. How Serfdom Saved Feminism.

Women, spoiled by chivalry, literally do believe they are nobility. And what does nobility need but a permanent underclass? By altering schools' language and decreasing standards, these aliens will not learn english and can never rise out of their underclass status (strangely, these changes were said to 'help' them yet how can you work at anything well in America without knowing English and having a grasp of the environment?) This new underclass is there for self-serving reasons. Feminism needs illegal immigration because feminists must have nannies.

Pook

Nature (December 1 to 20)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008l)

Some of you are morons.

Women marry up usually. They look down on someone who makes less or isn't as ambitious. That's why women end up "winning" in divorces.

95% of custody cases are won by women. That's good odds.

70% of divorces are initiated by women usually because they "fell out of love".

You get married to raise a family. Who wants to marry a woman with a job and an income to raise a family? Stupid argument to find a career girl. They make horrible home-makers.

Men aren't looking for someone who is a man. They want a wife, a home-maker, someone to look out for and raise kids properly.

I think most people have forgotten what marriage is about.

And by the way, just because you are married and not divorced yet, don't get so high and mighty, it could happen to you whether you want it or not.

When you get married in America, its the equivalent of a major de-balling. Most married men I know are miserable and have no say over anything because they know she has all the power.

American women are good for sportfuckin' but make terrible wives.

/I know not all women
//don't want to hear your anecdotal evidence, stats are there.
///seen too many good men get hammered by a fucked up legal system.

Unknown

Nature (December 1 to 20)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008k)

Feminazis can't argue logically or with any degree of skill or reason whatsoever, after all they are emotionally driven.

The minute you start using real stats and facts, they lose it and it caves in their feeble little non thinking and non intelligent minds, and at that point, all that they have left is insults and emotional drivel to hurl at you.

The very fact that fembots have gotten themselves into the position that they have over many years, and are now single, with or without kids, most with, and are manless in droves/record numbers, with marriage rates plummeting like a boulder to the bottom of the ocean, and also the fact that many of them are miserable with themselves, only proves further their complete lack of any degree of any intelligence whatsoever. Give them enough rope, and they will hang themselves through their own complete stupidity.

Its not nice to fool [with] mother nature, and the natural order of things will not be violated without serious repercussions. The man is to be in charge, the woman subservient, not abused, but she follows the man's direction. It's clearly what nature has intended for biological and intellectual reasons too numerous to list here.

They cut off their nose to spite their face, as they are now finding out much to their dismay.

Unknown

Nature (December 1 to 20)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008j)

Shortly after my daughter was born, I married her mother in order to take responsibility for my daughter. Her mother and I had been living together for about a year. For seven years we were father and daughter. She was my "angel baby" who made the world a different place for me, and I thought I was doing the right thing.

My son was born a few years later. I had a good job and was steadily accumulating wealth. I wasn't madly in love with the mother, but my children meant the world to me.

When my daughter was almost seven years old, the mother disappeared with my daughter and her younger brother. Her family denied any knowledge of her whereabouts, but police investigating the missing persons report I had filed found them living with her parents.

She wanted a divorce, and knew I would want custody of the children. She began making all of the standard false allegations that are now routine in family law child custody cases. One of her claims, in attempt to portray me as a villain, was that I had once accused her of lying about the paternity of one of the children.

Six months later, with the custody case approaching, I got a phone call from my lawyer who stated that the mother was now claiming I was not the father of my daughter. A DNA paternity test soon revealed that this time the mother was telling the truth. The news was shocking, devastating, and very depressing. Not only was my daughter not really my daughter, but my marriage was built on a lie.

Nevertheless, I still loved her like my daughter and continued paying "temporary" child support for her in order to be "allowed" to continue to "visit" her along with my son. In fact, this revelation about what sort of person the mother really is only made me more determined to get custody of both children, as this sordid gaming of children's lives was typical not of the mother but of her parents whom she ran back to live with. It wasn't a matter of whether I wanted custody or not, for the sake of the children I had to get them out of that sort of life.

During the trial, the mother testified under oath that she and "Jerry" had a fling while she was living with me, and that they discussed it and decided "it would be better if they let me think I was the father because I had more money. "Jerry" is not the bio father's real name, and I use that name not to protect his innocence/guilt but because when the mother revealed the name of the bio father she said his name was "Jerry", but it turned out later that was a lie too. After lying to me for seven years about paternity, she was now lying to the court naming a different man who didn't even know her. The court was not interested when I revealed this information.

Further, she testified under oath, that the reason she lied to me was to get money. And she had begun alienating the children from me, doing anything and everything she possibly could to prevent the children and I from seeing each other - even the judge admitted it. I produced as evidence in court her sworn statement on a paternity affidavit where she swore under oath that I was the father of my "daughter".

A normal person might think her revealing the sordid actions she committed using a child as bait in a fraud and perjury scam would work against her in a custody dispute. It took me a while to understand, but the reason she revealed the fact that she had lied about paternity in order to get money was, because the way family law works in America today, this helped her win her case.

The "mother" not only was "awarded" custody, but also half of my life savings, child support for both children, alimony, and I even had to pay about half of her attorney fees. Using children in fraud and perjury scams pays, with no fear of losing anything, and that is why it is so common today.

Despite the court knowing all of this, her lies under oath did not stop, and neither did her attempts to block my access to my children, nor her attempts to alienate them from me by lying to them about me and encouraging them to hate me.

This all finally came to an end when one of the children reported to me and many others that the mother was doing the same thing her father and two brothers did to her, sexually abusing children. No, I didn't finally get custody as a normal person would expect. The mother carrying on her family tradition of pedophilia was swept under the rug by DHS/CPS and it was never even brought up in the hearing meant to address it.

Instead, they did what they always do, go after the father. They said that because I admitted that I occasionally have a beer or two on weekends when the children are with me, they are going to put ME on supervised visitation. Being put on supervised visitation because your ex-spouse is molesting the children is very disconcerting. I had grown accustomed to and very weary of this sort of "justice" after a few dozen hearing with similar outcomes. Eventually, I gave up any and all hope that truth, justice, and children would ever matter in a "family court", and began trying to accept the fact that it is all about gender and money, because I now know and understand fully how even a pedophile who admits harming children and committing perjury will come out a "winner" depending on gender of course.

Despite my being the victim of paternity fraud, along with my daughter, the mother got what she had set out to get when she began her fraud and perjury scheme using a child seven years earlier. I went from financial independence with two children to being in debt with two children I could not even call on the telephone, and one of them, the reason I married the mother in the first place, wasn't even my real daughter. Not only have I committed no crime to justify my children and I being treated this way by government, but I wasn't even the one who filed for divorce. I struggle every day to accept the fact that because I was born the wrong gender and this sort of thing is profitable for certain groups of people, that my children and I have been relegated to this being a way of life for us.

So, if you wonder why paternity fraud is rampant, it's because not only is it legal for mothers to use children in fraud and perjury scams, it pays very well, and if you keep lying you can even avoid the inconvenience of having the "father" visit his "children" as you move on to the next guy. The only reason more women aren't doing this sort of thing is due to their own morality and decency, because not only does our judiciary not discourage or punish it, they actually reward it, then pretend they are doing what is best for children, like mine.

Unknown
Posted: Sun Jul 29, 2007 10:25 am

Nature (December 1 to 20)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008i)

Dear John Letter From WW1
Unknown

He survived the horrors of the trenches and the deprivations of a prisoner of war camp but for Pte Harry Nelson the deadliest blow came from the home front.

A letter from his wife Lil, sent to him in 1915 while he was a prisoner of war, includes a stark admission of adultery and the heart-breaking news that she is to leave him for another man.

Against the backdrop of the First World War this was a small personal tragedy. However, the devastating two page letter, found in a Government archive 90 years later, illustrates the high price that was paid even by some who did not lose their lives. The correspondence will be made available to the public tomorrow by the National Archive at Kew.

Ministry of Defence officials kept a typed copy of Lil Nelson's letter. In it she told her husband, who served in the 1st Bn Queen's Royal West Surrey Regiment, that she had fallen in love with a man who helped her to cope with the deprivations of wartime London. "I had to get rid of most of the home, for I could not pay the rent but thank God I have found a friend that loves me," she wrote.

"I hope you will not think it hard of me, but I am going right away in another land to a better home. Do not upset yourself over your little ones, for they are loved like me and well looked after. I hope you will not come and try and find me, nor take them away from me, for you are a man and I only a girl and their mother.

"I am going where I shall be well off and happy."

Mrs Nelson makes no allowances for the fact that her husband is a prisoner in Germany. She berates him for putting the happiness of his mother and sister before that of her own before he went off to war, and tells him his children regard her lover as their real father. She said her neighbours in Hammersmith, west London, still hold him in high regard and they will continue to write to him.

She goes on to reveal: "I shall be a mother to his little one soon, but yours are loved just the same.

"I hope you will not take this to heart too much for I know it is hard on you, but you will be better off without us, with your mother, and find someone to love better than me. I must close now, hoping you will not try and find us. Love from the little ones, they think he is their daddy (so he is)."

Mrs Nelson ends her letter with: "Your wife in name only, Lil," before adding: "Please God look after you and bring you home safe. This has been hard on me and has driven me to this."

Typical woman. When things get tough they run. This woman was a piece of manure. I hope this guy's grandchildren read this letter, and spit on her grave.

Unknown

Disgraceful - U&L

Nature (December 1 to 20)

TWO: Great Post (December 2008h)

A Working Joe's Vegas Experience

Unknown

I visited the Playboy Club at the Palms Casino in Las Vegas last night. I'm a working Joe who works in Las Vegas, and usually am very selective about what I do on the Strip because I know how much of a rip-off machine it can be. I believe in getting value for my money.

Nevertheless, I still wanted to see it. It was a learning experience. I paid the $40 dollar cover charge when I went there at 8:30pm. I was told that if I left I would have to pay the same amount if I wanted to come back in, and that the charge increases to $60 after 10pm.

I take the elevator, and go up to the club. It is a nice place, but not very big. There are multiple bars, and some are roped off because they are exclusive "VIP sections". There are bouncers everywhere, and I get the subtle message they are sending. The cocktail waitresses are dressed as bunnies (and very attractive), and I get a couple of photos of them (at least that's free). I don't want anything more than that because I figure these girls have heard everything and they are not going to put out unless you make it worth their while ($$$$$$$). I get jumped on by two bouncers for taking a photo of a bunny at a black jack table. The place is so overly supervised and I'm beginning to wonder how much fun I can really have here.

I go to a bar and ask how much a beer is - $7. There are some people there but I figure the place won't get lively till later - hence $60 entry after 10 pm. My options are: wait to see if it gets exciting, drink expensive drinks, try to talk to women who are arrogant and snotty (and will demand that you buy them expensive drinks), gamble (= lose money), stare outside the window to see the great view for hours, or leave. Since I've seen everything it has to offer and don't feel like wasting my money for nothing, I choose the least cost option.

The lesson I learnt is: unless you are a guy with a lot of money to throw away, you are not welcome. Unless you are a good looking girl with big tits and a hot body (who will be well protected by the bouncers against the guys, and can demand that guys bow down before you if they want you), you are not welcome.

As a man, this game is stacked against me. It is an example of all the things I have read about on americanwomensuck.com , dontmarry.com and other related web sites. The key to its social cruelty is sorting people by their ability to pay, overly protecting the females so they get to maintain their "princess entitlement" syndrome, and only offering options that rape my wallet.

Call me anti-social, but I didn't feel like hanging around and playing a losing game. The fantasy of Playboy will never become real for the majority of us, so there is no sense in pursuing it. I'd prefer to find a place that is more down to earth.

Playboy opened the door to such skanks as Anna Nicole Smith, the spoiled brats of the "Girls Next Door", and began this overly sexualized porn star culture we have today - why give them your money?

Unknown

Nature (December 1 to 20)

Saying What Most Of Us Have Thought

"If I get only one thing for Christmas, I hope it's your sister."

Unknown

TWO: Great Post (December 2008g)

The Appreciating Liability That Is Women
by Tiredofit
August 15, 2007, 7:43pm

The only disagreement I have with the op is that women are a depreciating asset. They start off as liabilities. But unlike other liabilities, they spawn new ones! The liability has a life of its own and is creating new ones in your financial statement that you may, or may not, know about.

As horrible as women are in taking away our money, they take away our most precious asset: time. Even when you aren't working all the time to pay for all those payments on the liabilities, on the weekend you get to do "outside work" or visit her relatives and be bored all day.

It may be stupid for a young man to buy an expensive car or something else of that magnitude. But at least the expensive car doesn't have a mind to buy an expensive garage to park itself. The expensive car does not magically create little cars. The expensive car does not decide to have a new owner. The expensive car does not crash itself on its own and expects you to pay for everything. You are totally in control.

At least with the expensive car, you can sell it. Try doing that with any woman! And the expensive car has an odometer which is illegal for the seller to manipulate. Women have no odometer. You have no idea how used they are for they lie all the time.

The comparison is good since, while an expensive car when young is a stupid deappreciating liability, it shows just how gigantic a deappreciating (and multipying!) liability that is American woman.

Tiredofit
(scroll down to August 15, 2007, 7:43pm)

Nature (December 1 to 20)

Saying What Most Of Us Have Thought

"As the days go by, I think of how lucky I am that you're not
here to ruin it for me."

Unknown

TWO: Great Post (December 2008f)

Lonely At The Top
by Malesamizdat

Once again, Michael Noer is vindicated! Career women are among the worst possible choices for a wife. All you empowyred caryyr chycks are fussing over being unable to find a man to marry (read: sucker for marriage). Yet you forget certain basic concepts.

1. If you look for a man of higher status than you, there are very few males available.
2. If you look for a man of lower status than you, you will eventually find him repulsive.
3. Men don’t want to marry the emotional equivalent of a man.

I quote directly from the linked story:

“I wanted to be overwhelmed by the sheer power of his masculinity in the bedroom, but I wasn’t. Because I felt like the man in our relationship [emphasis mine].”

Honey, you felt like a man because you were acting like one. Here’s another quote from the piece:

I felt guilty about being glad to go back to work, and in my head, I made it Mark’s fault. Because he couldn’t find a job, I blamed him when I was working late and had to miss the baby’s bedtime.

We have another sighting of flying pigs! A woman - actually, a feminist - admits that she, by fiat, made an undesirable situation her husband’s fault! “Blame men for everything” - If that isn’t the hallmark of today’s modern woman, I don’t know what is!

Malesamizdat

Nature (December 1 to 20)

Saying What Most Of Us Have Thought

"We have been friends for a very long time, what do u say say we call it quits?"

Unknown

TWO: Great Post (December 2008e)

Men From The FSU vs Western Men

Having traveled to the FSU extensively, I can tell you from personal experience that the main difference between foreign men and western men is this. Foreign men tend to DIFFERENTIATE between different kinds of women, and treat each kind accordingly, whereas western nice guys seem not to be able to accomplish this simple task.

In other words, a Russian guy will treat his wife and daughter the same way as a U.S. "nice guy" will treat women, but will treat a train-station hooker or a floozy in a bar the way a U.S. "player/jerk" treats women.

Now we know that U.S. women are bitches and whores, so to treat them nicely is just as stupid as to treat a real lady like a whore. But that's exactly what nice guys do, which is why they never get laid. And this is why jerks/players get what they want from U.S. bitches, because they treat them like the whores that they are.

The "sample points" (observations) we are missing of course is how "jerks/players/bad-boys" would treat a real lady. Unfortunately, since there really aren't any left in the U.S. (other than foreign women), we can't really answer that question.

Unknown but sounds like 'Jimp'

Nature (December 1 to 20)

Saying What Most Of Us Have Thought

"You are such a good friend that if we were on a sinking ship and there was only one life jacket... I'd miss you heaps and think of you often."

Unknown

TWO: Great Post (December 2008d)

For Amy, a divorced mom, dating in her 30s has been stressful. "I wish there was a manual for dating, because I have been out of the game for so long," she says. "Growing up, I always wanted to be a wife and a mom, and didn't expect that I would find myself single again."With four children at home, Amy faces a unique set of dating issues. "I run a criminal background check on every guy I go out with," she says. "I have to be very careful about who I invite into our lives."Amy also realizes that a woman with kids isn't what every guy is looking for. "I don't consider children baggage. I think they're the bonus piece to the set, but there are a lot of men who don't see it that way," she says.

Yup 70% of women file for divorce and screw their husbands in divorce court. Yet she is shocked that she is having a hard time finding another sucker. Well guess what Amy! Go cry me a river! We had to get over the fact that you don’t like nice boring guys and now you're just going to have to get over the fact that we don’t want used up whores who were chucked and fucked all over the place during their youth while letting those “suckers” rot all alone. No, men don’t want to raise other men’s spawns either. Having read from other men’s experiences a single mom is the worst type of woman to date because the man is getting used as a last resort. This is not about fulfilling the man’s needs it is about finding a human wallet and a life long wage slave.

Outcast Superstar

Nature (December 1 to 20)

Saying What Many Of Us Have Thought

"I'm so miserable without you, it's almost like you're here."

Unknown

TWO: Great Post (December 2008c)

Equality In The Workplace
(as long as it's the cushy jobs)
by Duncan Idaho

At least 75 miners are dead, a number that could rise, and at least 43 are missing after a methane gas explosion Monday at a coal mine in southwestern Siberia, the Russian Ministry of Emergency Situations said.

My deepest sympathies for the men and women who have died in this disast... Sorry. I mean, my deepester sympathies for the MEN who have died in this disaster. The sex of the deceased is not noted but I doubt very much if 50% of them are women. I would be surprised if one fucking cunt was amongst the dead.

And I doubt very much if the 'non-equal-outcome gender-specific quota' of the death-toll of this tragedy is going to spur some fembots into a big push to shove some more token-women into mining.

After all, despite women's collective demands for "equality in the workplace", they don't seem want to do dirty and dangerous jobs. Such jobs, apparently, are too good for them. Dirty jobs, dangerous jobs, harsh jobs are, in the eyes of women, the responsibility of the expendable and worthless half of humanity.

Us men, basically.

Yes, us men, us men who are somehow expected to form an endless queue of volunteers who will happily risk life and limb on oil-rigs or down mineshafts to ensure ****s the world over have enough fuel to drive to their Wimmin's Studies Class to bitch about how victimised they are, or enough electricity to power the televisions through which some Talk-Show Host informs them they are the most oppressed demographic in history, to which lazy do-nothing "housewife" Western ****s bark and shriek in multiple-chin-wobbling approval like clapping seals, in between scoffing down yet another tube of Thug-Spunk Flavoured Pringles.

Duncan Idaho

Nature (December 1 to 20)

Saying What Most Of Us Have Thought

"As the days go by, I think of how lucky I am that you're not here to ruin it for me."

Unknown

TWO: Great Post (December 2008b)

If something is 'nerdish', then that means most businesses cannot profit from that activity. Take books. Books are considered 'nerdish'. However, television is full of advertising. So it makes sense that marketing would portray television as "mainstream" and books as "nerd". They want television to appear 'cool' so they can make money.

Take staying at home for the evening. This is considered 'nerdish'. However, if you go to a fancy club, restaurant, or something else, this is marketed as 'mainstream' and 'cool'. No one makes money if you stay at home for the evening so no wonder they will belittle it.

Take clothes. Keeping care of your clothes and having them last a while is 'nerdish'. However, 'sticking with the fashions' is marketed as mainstream and cool. The reason is because they make money when you keep changing fashions. They make no money if you stick with your clothes. Oh, you evil men! How dare you not have The Social Life that women demand you to have!

There you sit, at the computer, playing video games, reading books, doing something that isn't 'social'. The idea is simple: you are to spend your free time out in public at 'trendy' areas. These include restaurants, coffee shops, and so on. You must spend your time "socializing", i.e. talking about nothing. With this, you will be considered "normal". If you read too much, spend too much time on the computer, then you will be considered a 'nerd' (OH NO, THEY MIGHT CALL YOU A NERD! YOU BETTER STOP WHAT YOU'RE DOING RIGHT NOW OR THEY MIGHT LABEL YOU! RUN! FLEE!)

The Social Life is truly the Woman's Life. Women, being matter over mind (rather than mind over matter as men tend to be), must be seen. What good is their asset (their flesh) if they are not easily seen? They view all of this as a grand lifestyle.

If women want to treat themselves as a parade float and go down every arena to fit an "image", then so be it. But the problem arises is that many women find this to be "normal" as in "The Way". Everything else is "abnormal".

This can easily be turned around. If women want to consider men who rarely socialize to be "dorks", then I will consider women who rarely internalize to be "airheads". The opposite of this lifestyle of image is the internal life. It is the strength of soul, the strength of intellect. It is a life just as if not more rich than the most expensive social life could ever afford.

Pook